E-Newsletter Sign Up!

Make Us Your Homepage

The business of biotech
Speaker says world interest in bio-tech wheat is rising

By Alan Reed
Managing Editor
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, February 4, 2010 11:03 AM CST



Alan Reed | Williston Herald Rebecca Bratter, director of policy for the United States Wheat Associates, speaks about biotech wheat Wednesday morning during the National Hard Spring Wheat Show in Williston.
Can increased market demands that translate into higher prices prompt enough wheat to be grown in the future to feed a growing global population, or is biotechnology needed to enhance yields?

United States Wheat Associates director of policy Rebecca Bratter took her best shot at building a case for biotechnology Wednesday morning before a somewhat skeptical audience of producers at the 57th annual National Hard Spring Wheat Show in Williston.

Bratter claims United States wheat producers overwhelmingly agree on pursuing biotech wheat. She said a National Association of Wheat Growers survey shows 70 percent of its members favor the use of GM technology for wheat.

"This is going to be a very complex process. That we don't underestimate at all," Bratter said. "I know there are folks who are not onboard with GM technology."

At least two outspoken producers in Wednesday's audience challenged much of what Bratter had to say. She said it's not if the U.S. commercializes biotech wheat, but when. Bratter said the world production of biotech crops continues to increase, with soybeans leading the way, followed by corn, cotton and canola. She said there are 23 biotech crops being grown in 23 overall countries on six different continents.

"We also know these crops, the imports are approved in 52 different countries," she said. "Most of this is happening in industrialized countries."

Some of the biotech crops that are currently produced are used for animal feed.

Bratter said it could very easily be China or India that produces the first biotech wheat for human consumption.

"Research on biotech wheat continues around the world. We're not the only ones talking about it," she said.

One of the fears associated with biotech wheat is how U.S. wheat competitors are going to react.

"They could clearly utilize this against us and take over our market," she said.

Bratter said a lot of the countries that import our wheat also are conducting biotech research. That research can be placed into there different categories -- input traits that help producers, output traits that help the wheat user or stacked traits that help wheat producers and users.

She said there are some traits that are already developed and are on the research shelf. If one of those existing traits is used, it could take about five years for a commercialized product to hit the market. Starting trait development from the very beginning, however, would mean 10 years before it would hit a commercialized market, Bratter said.

One big fact regarding wheat production is the surface area planted for the crop continues to decline over the past 25 years as other more profitable crops are planted, she said. Meanwhile, wheat consumption is rising 1.3 percent per year over the last 25 years.

"We're predicting by 2050, we're going to see the world population increase to over 9 billion people," Bratter said. "So we're going to have a lot of extra mouths to feed."

She said a new scientific revolution is needed to move the U.S. forward in wheat technology and wheat production.

"There is a huge resistance to biotech wheat. We also know there is a risk among manufacturers," Bratter said.

There are several benefits, however, to biotech wheat, Bratter said. These pluses include reduced crop production costs, reduced disease, weed and pest issues and fewer growing limitations like drought, temperature and salinity.

She said there are benefits for end users with improved flour and improved food safety.

The traits that are talked about the most involve drought tolerance and soil nutrient utilization, Brattter said.

"We also know we need to work very closely with our government," she said. "The regulatory process for biotech is going to be very challenging."

She said U.S. wheat customers are being told we are going to have a dual stream of wheat and the U.S. is always going to have segregation of biotech wheat and nonbiotech wheat. Any customer who doesn't want biotech wheat can purchase nonbiotech wheat, but it likely is to come at a premium price, she said.

Bratter said the U.S. wheat industry is preparing global buyers for the global commercialization of biotech wheat. The industry also knows some countries like Japan are going to be tremendous concerns.

"They have very strict food safety laws," she said of Japan. "Japan is normally our number-one market in the world."

Bratter acknowledges risk is inherent in the process of moving to biotech wheat and there is no way to avoid some risk moving forward.
 

Comments

    Jean wrote on Feb 10, 2010 4:56 PM:

    " I agree with Martha.

    In the 1980s, Monsanto Corporation got a bad name for polluting every square foot of the planet with noxious PCBs, dioxin, and harmful pesticides. Now Monsanto is a leader in the biotech revolution that threatens to engineeer the genes of every food crop on the planet with potentially desasterous consequences for the environment. In 1996 Monsanto introduced its RoundUp Ready soybean - which has been genetically altered to be resistant to the chemical herbicide glyphosate which is marketed by Monsanto as Roundup. The inbuilt resistance allows farmers to use the herbicide while the crop is growing. Other altered crops likeky to be marketed include maize, wheat, sugar beet, letuce, potatoes and poplar.
    Monsanto also owns 49.9 percent of Calgene, the maker of the Flavr Savr tomato engineered for longer shelf life. "

    Steve Savage wrote on Feb 5, 2010 1:10 AM:

    " Now that China has taken steps towards approval of GMO rice it is just a matter of time until they move on wheat. The coordinated effort between the US, Canada and Australia will go a long way to preventing the sort of blackmail that EU and Japanese buyers were able to use in the past. The customer is not always right when the decisions they make for their rich countries disadvantage the poor customers of the world with whom they compete for our wheat "

    martha wrote on Feb 4, 2010 2:23 PM:

    " It sounds like Monsanto (or Monsatan!) is trying to take over wheat production now. Monsanto has a history of taking over corn, cotton, and soybeans and now it looks like it's poised to do the same thing to wheat! Please resist this! "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Williston Herald is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in WillistonHerald.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Williston Herald. The Williston Herald does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Williston Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)
   

Contact Us

Mailing Address:
Williston Herald
P.O. Box 1447
Williston, ND
58802

Street Address:
14 W. 4th St.
Williston, ND 58801

Phone:
701-572-2165

Fax:
701-572-9563

Inside North Dakota:
1-800-950-2165

Classifieds

Shopping